User talk:Trade

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trade!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Category:Cosplay of Captain America and his cast in Belgium

Category:Cosplay of Captain America and his cast in Belgium is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

---

Rose Abrams (talk) 16:47, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• I fixed the category being empty@Rose Abrams: --Trade (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Category:Captain America and his cast characters by name

Category:Captain America and his cast characters by name is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

strangely specific

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

---

Rose Abrams (talk) 09:48, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Category:Videos_about_food

Videos about food has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

~2026-33029-76 (talk) 16:34, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

NSFW blurring

Hi, sorry I haven't been around recently. I made a gadget to blur images based on commons content descriptor wikidata property, as promised. You can test it out by adding mw.loader.load( 'https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bawolff/nsfw.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript') to meta:Special:MyPage/global.js. . Let me know what you think (ping also @Prototyperspective and @Some1). Bawolff (talk) 22:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Could you post this to Commons:Village pump/Proposals instead? That way we can discuss if it should be an opt-in or opt-out feature and how to best make it accessible for users and anonymous visitors alike@Bawolff: --Trade (talk) 01:21, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Bawolff, my findings so far:

1. I find an area on the left of the thumbnail where the button highlights but the cursor does not turn into a hand, and clicking does nothing.
2. I also got some Uncaught TypeError: src is undefined parseImageName debugger eval code:131 images debugger eval code:119 errors on [1].
3. If I click exactly on the "NSFW" text, nothing happens. I have to click slightly outside of it to open MediaViewer.
4. I would expect to simply reveal the thumbnail with a single click and open MV if I click the unblurred thumbnail instead of seeing potential NSFW content really big in MV with one click.
5. Out of the 100 search results, the last 22 are not blurred.
6. As far as I can tell there is no "reveal/obscure all" button.

But this is an interesting approach. I'm afraid though that similar to dark mode there will be no good way to offer this to as either opt-in or opt-out to anons? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:51, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

How do you feel about the way Wikimedia Commons content descriptor (P14416) is being used and the current selection of content descriptors (currently 4) @Alexis Jazz: --Trade (talk) 08:02, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Looking at d:Property:P14416 I think the four current descriptors are Sexual acts, Sexualized nudity, erotica or ecchi, Graphic violence, bodily mutilation or corpses and Medical or surgical gore.
Um.. well.. I guess that doesn't cover a person taking a shit.. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 09:10, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Ok, I put it at Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Gadget_to_hide_NSFW_images. Bawolff (talk) 20:39, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Installed, but it doesn't seem to be active always, for example {{2257}} tagged mages should be blurred by the script for example.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

the script is only intended to blur based on the value in SDC. It is not intended to blur based on other templates or categories. Bawolff (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Still it's a start. The issue would be in ensuring that media gets the appropriate SDC :(. As I've said on your talk page, 'technicaly feasible- yes.. Community support - unlikely. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

@Bawolff: Is it possible to add 2257 as an instance of the relevant property on Wikidata?. That would partially solve the problem. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:28, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

i'm not sure that is a good idea, as ultimately 2257 is correlated with nsfw status, but not an actual descriptor of the content. Ultimately though its up to the community. You should bring it up at Commons talk:Structured data/Modeling, or perhaps VP or d:Property talk:P14416. Bawolff (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Category:E621.net

E621.net has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

HyperAnd [talk] 09:11, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Content tagging

I'm curious what you see happening with the content descriptor tagging. Do you really anticipate most images being tagged? I assume your current workflow heavily leans on the category system? One thing I could do is use the models to power a tool to show people candidates for tagging. I think human tagging is a better option, but I'm skeptical the size of the task is doable even medium term. That's why I'm suggesting a new item for AI-assigned descriptors.

You alluded to this being a pressing issue for commons, but I'm not aware of the discourse or the opinion of commons editors. Could you fill me in or link me to a recent discussion? BrokenSegue 17:31, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Principle_of_least_astonishment#Photographs_by_Exey_Panteleev Trade (talk) 22:24, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

• @BrokenSegue: --Trade (talk) 22:25, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Category:Attentat von Volkhoven

Hi Trade, I have reverted your category name to the German category name. This massacre is a proper name since ~ 60 years now. No need for an English category name. I kept the Engish name as category redirect. Raymond (talk) 10:51, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Aren't event categories supposed to go by their English names? There's a reason Category:The Holocaust isn't called Category:The Shoah Trade (talk) 11:48, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Not necessary. "The Holocaust" is a worldwide known term. But this is not valid for a very local massacre. Wikimedia Commons is multilingual and it does not make sense to translate every massacre and event into English.In this local case a Wikidata item and a German Wikipedia article exist so that everyone understand the propper noun in German. Raymond (talk) 11:59, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

As a counterpart to the filter and classifiers...

Based on something someone at the WMF mentioned a while back, I came up {{Extended context}}. It's not yet widely used, but the existing usages are indicative, of what I had in mind for it's use, It's not (yet) been used for anything that is the more straightforward 'adult' NSFW content, though.

Your thoughts are appreciated, and if you want to start using it alongside the 'classifers' (the relevant SDC property) I am not going to object :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:21, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Ignore the above, I've reverted the uses of this template as "concerns arose.". ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:23, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Interesting. May i ask which issue this template is intended to solve? After all, if you are reading the template you are past the point of being able to avoid clicking or looking at the file so it's not really a warning @ShakespeareFan00: --Trade (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

This template is to provide an explanation as to why some content is on Commons even though it's sensitive or controversial. The reasoning here was that as you are already looking at the media (Commons and the blocking script doesn't directly block in File:namespace), you may as well have some explanation as to why the media is included on Commons , and why that inclusion is within the inclusion and scope policy. (If some of the fields remind you of fair-use rationale on local projects, that's partly where I got the idea from.)

Some of the ECR added recently, are to me not dissimilar to the 'ethics' panels some journal articles have in professional academia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Could you expand on "Non-substitutability"? Offhand, it seems to suggest that this is something of which we should have only the minimum number of images absolutely required. That's probably reasonable for some controversial content (e.g. photographs of normal erect human penises) but not at all for others (we probably want every distinct photograph of Adolph Hitler that we can get, and if there are multiple prints we probably want those, too, just like any other historic figure of that magnitude). - Jmabel ! talk 23:52, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

(I assume this template was somewhat influenced by en-wiki's non-free use templates where non-substitutability is a legal issue.) - Jmabel ! talk 23:54, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

This isn't so much about the number of images (but thank you for raising that point.), but about why a different image (possibly one that's blurred, or doesn't show some details) wasn't used instead. If you wanted to attempt a clarified wording, feel free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:59, 23 June 2026 (UTC)